|
|
|
| Clinical application and analysis of different nutritional intervention in gynecologic tumor patients during perioperative period |
| 1Gynecology Department of Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Gynecology Department of Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning, China; 2Nursing Department of Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Nursing Department of Liaoning Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical application of nutritional intervention in gynecologic tumor patients during perioperative period. Methods90 patients with gynecologic cancer treated in our hospital from January 2017 to July 2017 were selected as the object of study. All patients were treated with symptomatic surgery. Be in accordance with the nutritional intervention time and method, the patients were divided into observation group (n=45) and control group (n=45), the control group received the way of routine preoperative fasting and nutritional support 6h after, patients in the observation group received the way of nutrition support form the preoperative 4 days. Two groups of patients respectively on admission, 7 days after operation and 14 days after operation after admission of the nutritional status of SGA scale (subjective global assessment) and objective indicators of nutritional status (including number of lymphocytes, albumin, transferrin, prealbumin, hemoglobin) for a reasonable evaluation and indicators related to the operation and follow-up were compared between the two groups of 6 the quality of life (SF-36). ResultsAt the time of admission, no significant differences between the two groups of patients with SGA scale and objective nutritional status index (P>0.05), 7 days after operation and 14 days after operation, the two groups of patients with normal nutrition, mild malnutrition and moderate malnutrition SGA scale index and objective nutritional index was significantly better than that of admission, the observation of SGA scale group 14 days after operation and objective nutritional status index of optimal difference (P<0.05); by comparison, the observation group of patients with intestinalperistalsis recovery time, exhaust time and weight related indicators significantly better than the control group, the difference was significant (P<0.05); in addition, found in two groups of patients were followed up for 6 months to observe. The short-term quality of life group patients were significantly better than the control group (P<0.05). ConclusionsEarly nutritional nursing intervention in the perioperative period in patients with gynecological tumors play an important role, which can not only improve effectively the nutritional status of patients, and to a certain extent, but also can improve the quality of life of patients.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
